Introduction

The historical process of imperialism and colonization was brutal in all senses. Although it has been varied and diverse among the different European powers, some historians like George Foster (1960) argue that there is a common ground in the imposition and assimilation of the colonizer culture over the colonized one. For sure we cannot speak of a hegemonized process of conquest since it varies in many historical aspects, but I agree this was the case with the British colonies in the Americas. I argue that the segregation produced by the British settlers in Canada prohibited the multiculturalism that can be seen in Latin America and therefore more radical measures were taken to repress the use of native languages and begin with the process of assimilation, such measures include residential schools and reserves for indigenous populations (Figure 1). This is why linguistic reconciliation is necessary to be able to provide a sense of cultural independence from the colonizer and enforce an atmosphere of mutual respect and cooperation. However, I also believe that the process of reconciliation must be implemented respectfully to be aware of possible personal implications with tribal subjects. This exhibit acknowledges that a process of linguistic reconciliation, in the sense of preservation, respect, and cooperation, is not only a matter of cultural integrity but also a foundation for healing historical wounds and establishing a future of mutual respect and understanding. Through an exploration of linguistic preservation and national self-cultural identity, an analysis of language enforcement proposals, and a historical sense of nation building I will show why reconciliation is a problem that must be solved in order to accept multiculturalism and acknowledgment of indigenous people's human rights.